RESUMO
Girdlestone's arthroplasty is an uncommon surgical procedure; it is performed in patiens with recurrent infection of the hip, polymicrobic sepsis or after multiple revisions. The number of hip replacements all over the world is always increasing, so the total number of prosthesis infections also continues to rise, although the relative incidence is lower than in the past. For this reason Girdlestone's arthroplasty must be a well-known procedure to hip surgeons. Clinical assessment of such patients cannot be performed with common hip ratings (e.g. Harris Hip Score) since hip instability, low range of motion, limb shortening and severe muscle loss are common. The patient's independence in daily living activity and freedom from pain should be the surgeon's main goals. We propose a specific clinical score for the outcome of the procedure, which is not to be found in the current literature as far as the authors are aware. The score can be useful for comparative clinical trials, for legal medicine purposes, etc. To illustrate it, we present 20 cases of Girdlestone's arthroplasty out of 265 hip revisions performed in our hospital. The outcome of the procedure in our patients was clinically good in eight cases, intermediate in ten cases, and bad in two cases. We believe the performing of such an intervention is justified when indicated by clinical signs, as we analyse them in our work. Our clinical score has been shown to be adequate to assess the clinical presentation of such patients.
RESUMO
Vascular lesions in hip prosthetic replacement are rare events; it is mandatory to be aware of the risk, though, in order of the vascular bundle's proximity to the surgical field. A 74-year-old patient was admitted to our department for primary hip arthroplasty for osteoarthritis. The patient was healthy but had mild hypertension. A cemented total hip prosthesis was implanted. The patient complained of growing groin pain and swelling from the third postoperative day. The suspicion of a vascular injury arose with worsening pain and low haemoglobin at blood tests. Then ultrasonography scans and digital angiography were performed, showing a superficial femoral artery pseudo-aneurysm. The patient had further surgery to repair the lesion. In the described case, the pseudo-aneurysm might have been caused by the pulling of a Hohmann retractor on arterial vessels possibly affected by atherosclerosis. The final output was favourable, but the authors point out that knowledge of neurovascular anatomy is necessary as well as postoperative surveillance of the clinical presentation of the patient if groin pain or swelling should arise. In the case of suspicion of vascular lesions, ultrasound and angiography will allow diagnosis and confirm the indication for surgical repair.
